AC/DC - basics of EV charging explained
Having an ICE vehicle and not knowing much about the details of the refueling process is not too big a deal - it's straightforward enough that it doesn't really matter. With electric cars it's certainly advisable that you are familiar with charging process, though, as it has an impact on the user experience.
When you are refueling you wait for two to three minutes, you pay the amount according to the volume of fuel you received and you are good to go. If you have an electric car though, quite often the “fuel station” is your own house and you need to have knowledge of your electric installation and the equipment in your car. And when you do charge at public charging stations, there are also things that you need to know, for example the maximum charging power of the charger and that of your car. Let’s try to clarify the charging topic.
AC charging
The overwhelming majority of the charging sessions that take place in an electric vehicle are of this type. The principle is simple. The domestic or public interface, both provide AC current. The on-board charger of the vehicle converts the AC electricity to DC in order to charge the battery.
To determine the maximum charging power of our car we need to know two things. First, the electric specifications of our home electric installation or the public interface and the relevant specifications of the on-board charger of the car.
The domestic electric installation may be one phase or three phase. The 1-phase power is calculated as follows: P= V * I. 1-phase voltage depends on where you live and in Europe it is 230V. Multiplying it by the current we have the charging power that the electric installation can provide.
For example if we have 230V voltage and 32A current, the charging power is 7.36 kW (230V * 32A). In case of 3-phase electricity, with 400V voltage and 32A current, the charging power is calculated as follows: P= V * I * √3 = 400V * 32A * 1.732 = 22 kW. It is obvious that a 3-phase electric installation can provide much more power than a 1-phase installation.
Let’s go over to the car now. If the on-board charger matches the electric installation, then the power fed to the car is the same. For example, if you have a Mercedes-Benz EQS with the 22 kW optional on-board charger, you can take full advantage of the above 3-phase electrical installation and charge your car with 22 kW using the relevant wallbox. Unfortunately, if you have the 3-phase installation and you connect your car to a schuko (type F) plug, with typical 10A current, you will get a mere 2.3 kW.
To calculate the required charging time for your car, you need the net energy content of your battery in kWh and the net charging power. If you have a car with a 50kWh battery, an on-board charger of 11kW and typical charger efficiency of 94%, then the required charging time is 50/(11*0.94)= 4 hours and 50 minutes. This is theoretical though and how close it may or may not be to reality depends on the so-called charging curve which is vehicle-dependent. Typically with home installations and their lower output you will come pretty close to the expected number.
DC charging
In the DC charging area, things are a lot simpler. Since the DC charger provides DC current and the EV battery is also DC, then the on-board charger is irrelevant in the process. The maximum charging power that the battery can receive depends on two factors - its specs and the capability of the rapid charger.
In general, EV batteries use 400V voltage, but lately modern EVs use 800V+ architectures with some examples being Porsche Taycan, Audi E-Tron GT, Hyundai Ioniq 5, Kia EV6 and Lucid Air. These cars allow charging power of up to 350 kW with the respective 800V chargers.
The charging power is also dependent on cooling. Most current cars have liquid cooled batteries, something necessary to handle the thermal load that rapid charging involves. Cars with passive air cooled batteries typically limit the DC charging power to 50kW to avoid excessive temperatures in the battery pack.
Electric car manufacturers typically recommend charging level up to 80% when using DC charging, to reduce the wear of the battery and because charging power over 80% drops significantly and it doesn’t make much sense to push further than that.
A missed opportunity (?)
Charging as a process would be fundamentally simpler if only DC was used in electric cars. This may sound controversial but if electric cars used only DC charging, the on-board charger wouldn’t be needed, which would make cars cheaper and lighter and the vehicle owner wouldn’t need any cables at all in his trunk or frunk.
In the domestic field, the owners would use DC wallboxes with maximum power of 22 kW, similar to AC wallboxes. DC domestic wallboxes are commercially available today but they cost five to seven times more compared to AC wallboxes. Nevertheless, if all the manufacturers adopted only the DC charging option, the economy of scale would come into play and the prices for domestic DC chargers would significantly decline.
Arguably this decision should have been made from the beginning of the e-mobility era, but alas it's still not. This may be considered one of the biggest missed opportunities for e-mobility in general.
Reader comments
- Anonymous
Hydrogen would need to be so efficient, that it actually MAKES me money whilst driving in order for me to even consider getting in a vehicle with a highly volatile & flammable gas (in the presence of a catalyst) on board. Not to mention invisible...
- 12 Jul 2024
- vFX
Hydrogen has proven to be an economic failure. There's just no way out. It has failed as a practical concept. Its storage and transmission is risky and expensive, its micro-generation even at point of sale requires massive investment, so decen...
- 10 Jul 2024
- U{B
Firstly, may I thank the author, Mr. Loukas for a fine, informative read on charging and electrics in general. Thanks. I learned some new things. However, making entire e-mobility work on DC on the user end, has its own merits and flip sides: ...
- 10 Jul 2024
- U{B